Highlights
- •Critical care transport nurses require specialized training.
- •Routine simulation resulted in increased nursing knowledge and skills.
- •There is improved nursing self-efficacy and satisfaction with stimulation.
- •Knowledge assessments are possible through tests and checklists.
- •Structured, educational debriefings are important with simulations
Abstract
Objective
As the health care setting has become more centralized, there has been an increased
need for critically ill neonatal and pediatric patients to be transported to facilities
for a higher level of care. These interfacility transports are possible through the
utilization of highly specialized teams of health care providers. Unfortunately, there
is currently a lack of consistency in training these teams to provide safe care. The
purpose of this integrative review was to identify the best practice for improving
nursing knowledge and self-competency in critical care neonatal and pediatric interhospital
transport.
Methods
A literature search was conducted to answer the following question: What are the best
practices to improve/assess nursing knowledge and self-competency in critical care
neonatal and pediatric interhospital transport? The articles found were then appraised
using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model's appraisal tool.
Results
Eight articles were included in the final review and found to be of good quality.
From these articles, 4 themes were identified that address the best practices in the
education of critical care transport nurses: increased knowledge and skills with simulation,
improved self-efficacy and satisfaction of nurses with simulation, knowledge assessment
is feasible through tests and checklists, and the importance of debriefing among nurses
with simulation.
Conclusion
The incorporation of routine simulations that include knowledge tests, checklists,
and targeted educational debriefings for interhospital neonatal and pediatric critical
care transport teams improves and verifies nursing knowledge and self-competency.
Future research should focus on the design and curriculum specifications of this educational
plan within critical care interhospital transport.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Air Medical JournalAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Problems in interhospital pediatric intensive care transport in The Netherlands: results from a survey of general pediatricians.Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29: 1555-1559
- Worries and concerns experienced by nurse specialists during inter-hospital transports of critically ill patients: a critical incident study.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010; 26: 138-145
- Interhospital transport of pediatric patients in denmark: a survey of current practice.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020; 36: 389-392
- Interhospital transport of the neonatal patient.Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2016; 17: 140-146
- Non-technical skills evaluation in the critical care air ambulance environment: introduction of an adapted rating instrument–an observational study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24: 24
- Care intensity during transport to the critical care resuscitation unit: transport clinician's role.Air Med J. 2020; 39: 473-478
- High-fidelity simulation for transport team training and competency evaluation.Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2009; 9: 200-206
- Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: experiences and challenges, a qualitative study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27: 27
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ. 2021; 372: n71
- Pediatric specialized transport teams are associated with improved outcomes.Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 40-48
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Model and Guidelines.3rd ed. Sigma Theta Tau International, Indianapolis, IN2017
- Retention curves for pediatric and neonatal intubation skills after simulation-based training.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016; 32: 71-76
- A quality improvement project using high-fidelity simulation training to improve clinical knowledge among critical care transport nurses.Clin Simul Nurs. 2018; 14: 54-60
- Airway management: a structured curriculum for critical care transport providers.Air Med J. 2016; 35: 138-142
- Standard instruction versus simulation: educating registered nurses in the early recognition of patient deterioration in paediatric critical care.Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 36: 287-292
- Human patient simulation education in the nursing management of patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a randomized, controlled trial.Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: 271-276
- Effectiveness of simulation training and assessment of picu nurses' resuscitation skills: a mixed methods study from the Netherlands.J Pediatr Nurs. 2021; 59: e52-e60
- Effectiveness of 2 methods to teach and evaluate new content to neonatal transport personnel using high-fidelity simulation.J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008; 22: 319-328
- Mixed-reality simulation for a pediatric transport team: a pilot study.Air Med J. 2020; 39: 173-177
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: July 31, 2022
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2022 Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
