Management of Septic Shock in the Remote Prehospital Setting

      Highlights

      • We looked at the management of septic shock by remote retrieval medical teams.
      • Treatment was initiated early, and patients were managed aggressively in the retrieval setting.
      • We observed a lower mortality rate (13.4%) for this cohort than the national average (32.4%).

      Abstract

      This study aims to assess the management of septic shock by air medical retrieval teams in the remote setting. A retrospective observational study was performed over 36 months. Sixty-seven adult patients who met the criteria for septic shock were included. Respiratory sepsis was the working diagnosis for 53% of patients; this was confirmed on intensive care unit (ICU) discharge in 39% of patients. Intravenous antibiotics and oxygen were delivered in over 90% of patients. Central and arterial line insertions were performed in 48% and 40% of patients, respectively, and 79% of patients were catheterized. Thirty-three percent of patients required intubation, and 80% of patients received an initial crystalloid fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg. Vasopressors were started in 89% of patients. Upon reaching definitive care, 91% of patients were admitted to a high-dependency or ICU setting, with a median length of ICU stay of 4 days and a 30-day mortality of 13%. Of those admitted to the ICU, intubation was required in 48%, new renal support in 20%, and blood pressure support in 84% of patients, respectively. Septic shock was recognized early and managed aggressively by remote retrieval teams, which may have contributed to the low mortality rate observed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Air Medical Journal
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Australian Bureau of Statistics
        Northern Territory–SSD by Indigenous Status and Age, From 2006 Consensus Population and Housing.
        ABS, Canberra2007
      1. Larson A. Rural health’s demographic destiny. Rural and remote health (2006). www.rrh.org.au. Accessed April 23, 2015.

        • Davis J.
        • Cheng A.
        • Humphrey A.
        • Stephens D.
        • Anstey N.
        Sepsis in the tropical Top End of Australia’s Northern Territory: disease burden and impact on Indigenous Australian.
        Med J Aust. 2011; 194: 519-524
        • Levy M.
        • Dellinger R.
        • Townsend S.
        • et al.
        The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting sever sepsis.
        Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36: 222-231
        • Guerra W.F.
        • Mayfield T.R.
        • Meyers M.S.
        • Clouatre A.E.
        • Ricco J.C.
        Early detection and treatment of patients with sever sepsis by prehopsital personnel.
        J Emerg Med. 2013; 44: 1116-1125
        • Finfer S.
        • Bellomo R.
        • Lipman J.
        • French C.
        • Dobb G.
        • Myburgh J.
        Adult-population incidence of severe sepsis in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units.
        Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 589-596
        • Seymour C.W.
        • Cooke C.R.
        • Heckbert S.R.
        • et al.
        Pre-hospital intravenous access and fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis; an observational cohort study.
        Crit Care. 2014; 18: 533
        • Beest P.A.V.
        • Malder P.J.
        • Oetomo S.B.
        • Broek B.V.D.
        • Kuiper M.A.
        • Spronk P.E.
        Measurement of lactate in a prehospital setting is related to outcome.
        Eur J Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 318-322