Air Medical Journal
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 185-187, July 2008

Successful Training of HEMS Personnel in Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement

  • R.J. Frascone, MD

      Affiliations

    • LifeLink III, Minneapolis, MN
    • Emergency Medical Services, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: R.J. Frascone, MD, Regions Hospital EMS, 640 Jackson Street, MS: 13801B, St. Paul, MN 55106
  • ,
  • Greg Pippert, MD

      Affiliations

    • LifeLink III, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • William Heegaard, MD

      Affiliations

    • LifeLink III, Minneapolis, MN
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • Paul Molinari, MD

      Affiliations

    • Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN
  • ,
  • David Dries, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN

Abstract 

Introduction

To evaluate laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) placement by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) personnel after a comprehensive training program.

Methods

HEMS flight staff attended a didactic and manikin-based training session for both devices. After this training, they attempted LMA and ILMA placement in live, anesthetized patients in an operating room (OR). Outcome measures included placement success rates with the LMA, ILMA, and endotracheal intubation through the ILMA, time to ventilation, and time to intubation. Success rates and time to ventilation were compared using chi-squared and analysis of variance (ANOVA), respectively. Mean time to ventilation for the first and second placements of both devices was examined with repeated measures ANOVA.

Results

There was no difference in successful placement of the LMA compared with the ILMA (100% vs. 91%, P = .15). Ninety-five percent (19/20) of patients were successfully intubated through the ILMA. Time to intubation was 57.1 ± 55 seconds (range, 20–240). Mean time to ventilation with either device did not differ significantly (36.8 ± 17 vs. 38.05 ± 20 seconds; P = .29). Mean time to ventilation for the first and second placement of either the LMA (P = .45) or the ILMA (P = .47) was not statistically different.

Conclusion

Trained HEMS flight staff are capable of effectively placing the LMA and ILMA in the operating room after a comprehensive training protocol.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1067-991X(08)00002-3

doi:10.1016/j.amj.2007.11.002

Air Medical Journal
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 185-187, July 2008