Air Medical Journal
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 38-44, January 2007

Results and recommendations from the helicopter EMS pilot safety survey 2005

  • MarkAlain Dery, DO, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Tulane University School of Medicine
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: MarkAlain Dery, Tulane University School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave., SL-87, New Orleans, LA 70112-2699
  • ,
  • Jack Hustuit

      Affiliations

    • Keystone Flight Services
  • ,
  • Greg Boschert

      Affiliations

    • Allegheny LifeFlight
  • ,
  • John Wish, PhD

Abstract 

Introduction

In 2005, the Pilot Safety Study Group (PSSG), consisting of members of the Association of Air Medical Services Research Committee, wrote, distributed, and analyzed a survey of helicopter pilots regarding their knowledge, attitude, and perspectives on safety in the field of air medical transport.

Methods

The Pilot Safety Survey 2005 (PSS2005) was based on another survey—one that was sponsored by Helicopter Association International (HAI) and National EMS Pilots Association (NEMSPA) and administered to pilots in 2001. The PSS2005 pared questions down so that the survey could be completed in 15 minutes on the internet, and the answers were organized in a manner to simplify analysis. An electronic link to the survey was distributed in a non-randomized fashion to HEMS pilots using the mailing lists of various operators and HEMS programs. Questions were clustered into eight groupings of safety, with a majority of responses being categorical, lending themselves to cross-tabulations.

Results

The information gathered indicated that Helicopter EMS (HEMS) pilots are very experienced, with the average pilot logging 6,625 flight hours. Collectively, they took responsibility for HEMS accidents; with 92% of total respondents citing “pushing weather minimums” and 82% citing “pilot decision making” as the main reasons for crashes. Crew resource management (CRM) was well appreciated by the pilots; there appeared to be a positive correlation with programs that offer their employees CRM and the pilots' general perspective on safety. The survey was also clear that amongst 40% of the respondents, mission-oriented training needs improvement, and 74% responded that more realistic training in flight simulators would improve safety overall. Finally, 57% of the pilots both desired night vision goggles or devices (NVG/NVD) and believed that their usage would improve safety in the field of air medical transport (55% vs 45%, P = .0025).

Conclusions

Although the recommendations from the PSS2005 are lacking in definite evidence for a decrease in HEMS crashes, we consider the direct input from pilots as critical in the absolute elimination of crashes in Helicopter EMS (Vision Zero). Pilots are, after all, the very ones held responsible for HEMS crashes. Based on these findings, the PSSG hopes that the HEMS community will incorporate the following recommendations into their standard practices. We recommend that all HEMS operators have annual and regular CRM training. We recommend that all HEMS pilots have annual and regular training in realistic flight simulators. Finally, we recommend that all HEMS aircraft be in possession of NVGs, and if this is not possible (eg, light pollution from a highly urbanized region or cost–benefit issues), then to have annual and regular mission-oriented nighttime training.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1067-991X(06)00234-3

doi:10.1016/j.amj.2006.08.002

Air Medical Journal
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 38-44, January 2007